Intraspecific variation in morphological and defensive traits of guava genotypes and their implications for herbivory


Por: Hernández-Cumplido, J, Romero-Pérez, A, Rodriguez-Saona, C, Quintana-Rodríguez, E, Orona-Tamayo, D, Padilla-Ramírez, JS, Callejas-Chavero, A, Tapia-Vela, R

Publicada: 20 may 2026
Resumen:
Introduction Intraspecific genotypic variation arising from artificial selection can shift how plants allocate resources, often unbalancing traits related to growth, reproduction, and defense. Such trade-offs may increase susceptibility to herbivory, particularly in genotypes subjected to strong selection. While perennial plants often retain ancestral traits, the effects of selective breeding on their morphological and chemical characteristics-and their consequences for plant-herbivore interactions-remain poorly understood. Here, we examined how intraspecific genotypic variation shaped by artificial selection influences morphological and biochemical traits in guava (Psidium guajava), and how these traits affect herbivory.Methods We evaluated seven guava genotypes, two wild, two landraces, and three cultivated to capture genetic variation using material from a germplasm bank in Zacatecas, Mexico. We measured tree, leaf, and fruit morphology; total soluble solids (degrees Brix); water content; and total phenolic compounds in leaves and fruits. Folivory and frugivory were also quantified.Results Most traits varied significantly among genotypes. Cultivated guavas generally had larger leaves, greater fruit biomass, and heavier seeds, but lower concentrations of chemical defenses in both leaves and fruits. However, no trade-offs were detected between morphological and defensive traits. Foliar herbivory varied among genotypes but was not associated with the origin of the plant. Moreover, herbivory showed no correlation with any morphological or biochemical traits.Conclusion Although artificial selection appears to have reduced certain defensive traits in some guava genotypes, the extent to which it has shaped trait expression and herbivore resistance in wild versus cultivated populations remains unclear.

Filiaciones:
Hernández-Cumplido, J:
 Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ecol & Recursos Nat, Mexico City, Mexico

Romero-Pérez, A:
 Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ecol & Recursos Nat, Mexico City, Mexico

Rodriguez-Saona, C:
 Rutgers State Univ, Philip E Marucci Ctr, Dept Entomol, Chatsworth, NJ 08019 USA

Quintana-Rodríguez, E:
 Ctr Innovac Aplicada Tecnol Competit CIATEC, Medio Ambiente & Biotecnol, Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico

Orona-Tamayo, D:
 Ctr Innovac Aplicada Tecnol Competit CIATEC, Medio Ambiente & Biotecnol, Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico

Padilla-Ramírez, JS:
 Aguascalientes INIFAP Carretera Aguascalientes, Campo Expt Pabellon, Aguascalientes, Zacatecas, Mexico

Callejas-Chavero, A:
 IPN, Escuela Nacl Ciencias Biol, Dept Bot, Ecol Vegetal, Mexico City, Mexico

Tapia-Vela, R:
 Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ecol & Recursos Nat, Mexico City, Mexico
ISSN: 28133595
Editorial
Frontiers Media SA, AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND, Suiza
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 5 Número:
Páginas:
WOS Id: 001782148000001
imagen Green Submitted, gold

MÉTRICAS