Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice


Por: Schaafsma, M., Ahn, S., Castro, A. J., Dendoncker, N., Filyushkina, A., Gonzalez-Jimenez, D., Huambachano, Mariaelena, Mukherjee, N., Mwampamba, T. H., Ngouhouo-Poufoun, J., Palomo, I, Pandit, R., Termansen, M., Ghazi, H., Jacobs, S., Lee, H., Contreras, V

Publicada: 1 oct 2023 Ahead of Print: 1 sep 2023
Resumen:
The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science -Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods and approaches exist to assess diverse value types. The evidence is based on the largest review of academic valuation studies on nature to date, developed for the Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We evaluate studies according to environmental justice criteria. The results suggest that although diverse value types and indicators are assessed across studies, few individual studies are plural, and studies fail to provide evidence on distributive justice and score low on procedural justice indicators. We provide a set of recommendations for incorporating issues of justice in the design of valuation studies.

Filiaciones:
Institute for Environmental Studies, VU Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1111, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Korea Environment Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong, 30147, South Korea
Department of Biology and Geology, The Andalusian Centre for the Evaluation and Monitoring of Global Change (CAESCG), University of Almería, Almería, Spain
Department of Geography, Institute of Life, Earth and Environment, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7044, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden
Institute for Ecosystems and Sustainability Research at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, Morelia Campus, 8701 Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro, Col. Exhacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia, C.P. 58190, Mexico
Native and Indigenous Studies Program, Global Indigenous Cultures and Environmental Justice Centre, Syracuse University, 900 South Crouse Avenue, New York, 13244, United States
Department of Social and Political Sciences, College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
Department of Ecosystems and Conservation, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3010, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania
International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Cameroon, Yaoundé, Cameroon
Congo Basin Institute (CBI), Nkolbisson Yaoundé, Cameroon
IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, IGE, Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy (CEEP), UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
Global Center for Food, Land and Water Resources, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Copenhagen, Denmark
OCP Foundation, 2-4, Rue Al Abtal, Hay Erraha, Casablanca, 20 200, Morocco
Research Team Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Brussels, 1000, Belgium
Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, South Korea
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Kreuzeckbahnstr. 19, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, D-82467, Germany
ISSN: 18773435





Current Opinion In Environmental Sustainability
Editorial
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Review
Volumen: 64 Número:
Páginas:
WOS Id: 001093143600001
imagen hybrid, All Open Access; Hybrid Gold

MÉTRICAS