Regional deforestation drives the impact of forest cover and matrix quality on primate species richness


Por: Galan-Acedo, Carmen, Spaan, Denise, Bicca-Marques, Julio Cesar, de Azevedo, Renata Bocorny, Villalobos, Fabricio, Rosete-Verges, Fernando

Publicada: 1 nov 2021
Resumen:
Land-use change transforms natural ecosystems, threatening species persistence worldwide. There is increasing evidence that forest loss negatively affects forest-dependent species and matrix quality can favor species main-tenance, whereas forest fragmentation has mainly null or positive effects on species. However, the effects of these landscape attributes may depend on the level of regional deforestation. Here, we assess the effects of forest cover, matrix quality, and forest fragmentation (forest patch density) on primate species richness in 92 landscapes in Brazil. We grouped landscapes by their regional deforestation level into low, intermediate, high, and severe deforestation. The effects of landscape attributes varied depending on the level of regional deforestation. Forest loss decreased the proportion of primate species in the four regional deforestation levels, but this association was more important in the low, intermediate and high regional deforestation levels. Matrix quality was positively related to the proportion of primate species in three regional deforestation levels and this association was more important in the high regional deforestation level. Yet, matrix quality decreased the proportion of primate species in the severe regional deforestation level. Forest fragmentation had no clear effects across all defores-tation levels. Therefore, different conservation strategies should be prioritized under distinct scenarios. Pre -venting forest loss is needed in all regions. Increasing matrix quality has positive effects on species richness, especially in highly deforested regions (30-15% remaining forest cover). Finally, as fragmentation had no clear effects on the proportion of primate species, landscape composition should be prioritized in conservation planning over landscape configuration.

Filiaciones:
Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Escuela Nacl Estudios Super, Antigua Carretera Patzcuaro 8701, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
Univ Veracruzana, Inst Neuroetol, Avenida Dr Luis Castelazo S N, Xalapa 91190, Veracruz, Mexico
Conmonomaya A C, Chemax 97770, Yucatan, Mexico
Pontificia Univ Catol Rio Grande, Lab Primatol, Escola Ciencias Saude e Vida, PUCRS, Av Ipiranga 6681 Pd 11, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Inst Chico Mendes Conservacao Biodiversidade, Ctr Nacl Pesquisa Conservacao Primatas Brasile, Floresta Nacl Restinga Cabedelo Rodovia, BR-230 Km 10, BR-58108012 Cabedelo, PB, Brazil
Inst Ecol A C, Red Biol Evolutiva, Carretera antigua Coatepec 351, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico
ISSN: 00063207





BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Editorial
Elsevier Ltd, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 263 Número:
Páginas:
WOS Id: 000704917200001

MÉTRICAS