Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) capillaroscopy study group consensus for the format and content of the report in capillaroscopy in rheumatology
Por:
Bertolazzi C., Vargas Guerrero A., Rodríguez-Reyna T.S., Sandoval H., Álvarez-Hernández E., Audisio M.J., Cabello E., Coral-Alvarado P., Díaz E., Duringan V., Espejo K., Gallegos S., Hernández-Molina G., Herrera B., Kayser C., Lara M.E., Maldonado G., Mamani M.N., Nitsche A., Ríos-Acosta C., Enrique-Romanini F., de Fonseca M.S., Vilela V.S., Villarreal-Alarcón M.A., Gutiérrez M., on behalf of the PANLAR Capillaroscopy Study Group (GECAP)
Publicada:
1 ene 2019
Resumen:
Objective: The aim of this work was to produce a consensus-based report for capillaroscopy in rheumatology to be used in daily clinical practice. Methods: A written Delphi questionnaire regarding capillaroscopy report was developed from a literature review and expert consensus. The Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international panel including 25 rheumatologists experts in capillaroscopy, asking them to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. The exercise consisted of three online rounds and a face-to-face (live meeting) that took place in the PANLAR 2018 congress held in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Results: The participants to the first, second, third, and face-to-face round were 22, 21, 21, and 16 rheumatologists, respectively. Fifty-five items were discussed in the first round, 58 in the second, 22 in the third, and 9 in the face-to-face meeting. At the end of the exercise, 46 recommendations for the capillaroscopy report in rheumatology reached a consensus. Conclusion: This is the first consensus-based report in capillaroscopy. It will be useful in daily clinical practice and to address the effort of the standardization in the technique. Key Points: • The current lack of consensus for the capillaroscopy report makes difficult the interpretation of findings as well as follow-up of rheumatic diseases. • This study produced the first international consensus for the format and content of the naifold capillaroscopy report in rheumatology. • The report is an integral part of the capillaroscopy examination and its use in a homogeneous form can help in the correct interpretation of findings in daily practice. © 2019, International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).
Filiaciones:
Bertolazzi C.:
Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Disorders, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada Mexico-Xochimilco 289, Colonia Arenal de Guadalupe, Mexico City, CP 143898, Mexico
Vargas Guerrero A.:
Departament of Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico
Rodríguez-Reyna T.S.:
Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
Sandoval H.:
Sociomedical Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico
Álvarez-Hernández E.:
Rheumatology Service, Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo Liceaga, SSA, Mexico City, Mexico
Audisio M.J.:
Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba City, Argentina
Cabello E.:
Rheumatology Service, Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabgoal Sologuren, Lima, Peru
Coral-Alvarado P.:
Reumatology Section, Santa Fe de Bogotá Foundation, Los Andes University, Bogotá, Colombia
Díaz E.:
Rheumatology Section, Hospital del Seguro Social Universitario, Universidad San Francisco Xavier, Sucre, Chuquisaca, Bolivia
Duringan V.:
Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Espejo K.:
Unidad de Reumatologia, Centro de Excelencia en Reumatología, Lima, Peru
Gallegos S.:
Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Dr. Dario Fernández Fierro, Mexico City, Mexico
Hernández-Molina G.:
Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
Herrera B.:
Rheumatology Section, Hospital del Seguro Social Universitario, Universidad San Francisco Xavier, Sucre, Chuquisaca, Bolivia
Kayser C.:
Department of Rheumatology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
Lara M.E.:
Rheumatology Department, Lagomaggiore’s Hospital, Mendoza, Argentina
Maldonado G.:
Department of Rheumatology, Espíritu Santo University, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Mamani M.N.:
Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Nitsche A.:
Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Ríos-Acosta C.:
Clinical Research Department, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Center, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Enrique-Romanini F.:
Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina
de Fonseca M.S.:
Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Vilela V.S.:
Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Villarreal-Alarcón M.A.:
Rheumatology Service, Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González”, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
Gutiérrez M.:
Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Disorders, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada Mexico-Xochimilco 289, Colonia Arenal de Guadalupe, Mexico City, CP 143898, Mexico
|