COMPARISON OF THE FECAL BACTERIAL MICROBIOTA COMPOSITION BETWEEN WILD AND CAPTIVE BOLSON TORTOISES (GOPHERUS FLAVOMARGINATUS)


Por: Garcia-De la Pena, Cristina, Garduno-Nino, Estefania, Vaca-Paniagua, Felipe, Diaz-Velasquez, Clara, Barrows, Cameron W., Gomez-Gil, Bruno, Manuel Valenzuela-Nunez, Luis

Publicada: 1 dic 2019
Resumen:
Research analyzing fecal microbiota provides important insights into the biological mechanisms affecting the health of animals. The Bolson Tortoise (Gopherus flavonsarginatus) is endemic to northern Mexico and is threatened mainly by habitat loss and collecting by humans. Here, we characterized the fecal bacterial communities of wild (10 samples) and captive (10 samples) G. flavomarginatus, and compared their microbiota analyzing the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene using high-throughput sequencing technology on Illumina Miseq platform. We identified 21 phyla, 44 classes, 66 orders, 139 families, and 463 genera for all G. flavoinarg,intrIns fecal samples. Bacterial communities showed significant differences between wild and captive tortoises at each taxonomical level. Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria were the most predominant phyla in wild tortoises. In captive tortoises, Firmicutes was the dominant phylum, followed by Fibrobacteres. At the genus level, Hydrogens:pima, GQ422712_g, and tleetivibrio were significantly more abundant in the wild population, whereas LDWW_g, HQ716403_g, AB239481_g, and Sporobacter predominated in the captive population. Diet could be the main factor responsible for differences between fecal microbiotas. All the individuals we analyzed were clinically healthy, which would mean that their bacterial communities are in apparent equilibrium. Nevertheless, the differences between the fecal bacteria of wild and captive tortoise populations indicate that, prior to releasing captive animals into the wild, inoculating them with wild-tortoise bacteria may improve their success at adjusting to a wild diet.

Filiaciones:
Garcia-De la Pena, Cristina:
 Univ Juarez Estado Durango, Fac Ciencias Biol, Durango 35010, Mexico

Garduno-Nino, Estefania:
 Univ Juarez Estado Durango, Fac Ciencias Biol, Durango 35010, Mexico

Vaca-Paniagua, Felipe:
 Fac Estudios Super Iztacala, Lab Nacl Salud Diagnost Mol & Efecto Ambiental, Tlalnepantla 54090, Estado De Mexic, Mexico

 Inst Nacl Cancerol, Ciudad De Mexico 14080, Mexico

 Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Estudios Super Iztacala, Unidad Biomed, Tlalnepantla 54090, Estado De Mexic, Mexico

Diaz-Velasquez, Clara:
 Fac Estudios Super Iztacala, Lab Nacl Salud Diagnost Mol & Efecto Ambiental, Tlalnepantla 54090, Estado De Mexic, Mexico

Barrows, Cameron W.:
 Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Conservat Biol, Palm Desert, CA 92211 USA

Gomez-Gil, Bruno:
 CIAD, Unidad Mazatlan Acuicultura & Manejo Ambiental, Mazatlan 82100, Sinaloa, Mexico

Manuel Valenzuela-Nunez, Luis:
 Univ Juarez Estado Durango, Fac Ciencias Biol, Durango 35010, Mexico
ISSN: 21510733





HERPETOLOGICAL CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY
Editorial
HERPETOLOGICAL CONSERVATION & BIOLOGY, C/O R BRUCE BURY, USGS FOREST & RANGELAND, CORVALLIS, OR 00000 USA, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 14 Número: 3
Páginas: 587-600
WOS Id: 000504841900007

MÉTRICAS