Immunization with neural derived peptides plus scar removal induces a permissive microenvironment, and improves locomotor recovery after chronic spinal cord injury


Por: Rodriguez-Barrera, Roxana, Flores-Romero, Adrian, Maria Fernandez-Presas, Ana, Garcia-Vences, Elisa, Silva-Garcia, Raul, Konigsberg, Mina, Blancas-Espinoza, Liliana, Buzoianu-Anguiano, Vinnitsa, Soria-Zavala, Karla, Suarez-Meade, Paola, Ibarra, Antonio

Publicada: 5 ene 2017
Resumen:
Background: Immunization with neural derived peptides (INDP) as well as scar removal-separately-have shown to induce morphological and functional improvement after spinal cord injury (SCI). In the present study, we compared the effect of INDP alone versus INDP with scar removal on motor recovery, regeneration-associated and cytokine gene expression, and axonal regeneration after chronic SCI. Scar removal was conducted through a single incision with a double-bladed scalpel along the stump, and scar renewal was halted by adding a,a'-dipyridyl. Results: During the chronic injury stage, two experiments were undertaken. The first experiment was aimed at testing the therapeutic effect of INDP combined with scar removal. Sixty days after therapeutic intervention, the expression of genes encoding for TNF alpha, IFN gamma, IL4, TGF beta, BDNF, IGF1, and GAP43 was evaluated at the site of injury. Tyrosine hydroxylase and 5-hydroxytryptamine positive fibers were also studied. Locomotor evaluations showed a significant recovery in the group treated with scar removal + INDP. Moreover; this group presented a significant increase in IL4, TGF beta, BDNF, IGF1, and GAP43 expression, but a decrease of TNF alpha and IFN gamma. Also, the spinal cord of animals receiving both treatments presented a significant increase of serotonergic and catecholaminergic fibers as compared to other the groups. The second experiment compared the results of the combined approach versus INDP alone. Rats receiving INDP likewise showed improved motor recovery, although on a lesser scale than those who received the combined treatment. An increase in inflammation and regeneration-associated gene expression, as well as in the percentage of serotonergic and catecholaminergic fibers was observed in INDP-treated rats to a lesser degree than those in the combined therapy group. Conclusions: These findings suggest that INDP, both alone and in combination with scar removal, could modify the non-permissive microenvironment prevailing at the chronic phase of SCI, providing the opportunity of improving motor recovery.

Filiaciones:
Univ Anahuac Mexico, Ctr Invest Ciencias Salud CICSA, Campus Norte, Huixquilucan, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
Univ Anahuac Mexico, Fac Ciencias Salud, Campus Norte, Huixquilucan, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
Ctr Invest Proyecto CAMINA AC, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
UAMI, Posgrad Biol Expt, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Med, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
Hosp Pediat CMN Siglo XXI, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
UAMI, Lab Bioenerget & Envejecimiento Celular, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
CMN Siglo XXI, UIMEN, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
ISSN: 14712202
Editorial
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 18 Número: 1
Páginas:
WOS Id: 000392143300001
ID de PubMed: 28056790

MÉTRICAS