Evaluation of TALK© training for interprofessional clinical debriefing in Latin America


Por: Diaz-Navarro C., Armijo-Rivera S., Prudencio-Palomino C., Velazco-González J.G., Castro P., León-Castelao E.

Publicada: 1 ene 2024
Resumen:
Background: Healthcare systems must adapt iteratively in response to external and local challenges while keeping patients and staff safe. Clinical debriefing is a cost-effective contributor to safety culture, facilitating learning and team adaptations that lead to improved processes, patient outcomes, and staff resilience. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, an interest has emerged in adopting TALK© to guide clinical debriefing to promote safety, mutual support, and cultural change within healthcare teams in Latin American contexts. Aims: To evaluate the quality and applicability of TALK© debriefing training in Latin American settings and the willingness to debrief after an educational intervention. Methods: Retrospective and descriptive study, examining anonymous data collected over 18 months after completing a “TALK© Debriefing Course for Healthcare Professionals” face-to-face or online. Data collected included participant characteristics, course details, quality and applicability of the intervention, and willingness to debrief. Results: Five hundred and forty-five participants were enrolled, most from Argentina and Mexico. The overall quality of the intervention scored 19.62/20 points, obtaining 4.86/5 points for applicability. There were no significant differences between virtual and face-to-face sessions. After the intervention, =93.76% of participants felt able to engage in clinical debriefing, and 97.06% reported willingness to debrief. Conclusions: Dissemination of multi-professional clinical debriefing training in Latin America is feasible and easily scalable. The quality of the educational intervention was rated excellent in both virtual and face-to-face settings, supporting the value of remote educational diffusion. Most participants in this study intervention felt prepared and willing to debrief following the intervention. © 2024 The Author(s)

Filiaciones:
Diaz-Navarro C.:
 Department of Perioperative Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom

 TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom

Armijo-Rivera S.:
 TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom

 Simulation and Innovation Unit, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Providencia, Chile

Prudencio-Palomino C.:
 TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom

 Nursing Continuous Education, Hospital Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Velazco-González J.G.:
 TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom

 Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

Castro P.:
 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain

 Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain

León-Castelao E.:
 TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom

 Clinical Simulation Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
ISSN: 01884409
Editorial
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA, México
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 55 Número: 7
Páginas:
WOS Id: 001327585500001
ID de PubMed: 39332151
imagen hybrid, All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access