Fifth ovarian cancer consensus conference of the gynecologic cancer intergroup: Recurrent disease


Por: Wilson M.K., Pujade-Lauraine E., Aoki D., Mirza M.R., Lorusso D., Oza A.M., du Bois A., Vergote I., Reuss A., Bacon M., Friedlander M., Gallardo-Rincon D., Joly F., Chang S.-J., Ferrero A.M., Edmondson R.J., Wimberger P., Maenpaa J., Gaffney D., Zang R., Okamoto A., Stuart, Ochiai K., on behalf of the participants of the Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference

Publicada: 1 ene 2017
Resumen:
This manuscript reports the consensus statements regarding recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), reached at the fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (OCCC), which was held in Tokyo, Japan, in November 2015. Three important questions were identified: (i) What are the subgroups for clinical trials in ROC? The historical definition of using platinum-free interval (PFI) to categorise patients as having platinum-sensitive/resistant disease was replaced by therapy-free interval (TFI). TFI can be broken down into TFIp (PFI), TFInp (non-PFI) and TFIb (biological agent-free interval). Additional criteria to consider include histology, BRCA mutation status, number/type of previous therapies, outcome of prior surgery and patient reported symptoms. (ii) What are the control arms for clinical trials in ROC? When platinum is considered the best option, the control arm should be a platinum-based therapy with or without an anti-angiogenic agent or a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. If platinum is not considered the best option, the control arm could include a non-platinum drug, either as single agent or in combination. (iii) What are the endpoints for clinical trials in ROC? Overall survival (OS) is the preferred endpoint for patient cohorts with an expected median OS < or=12 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) is an alternative, and it is the preferred endpoint when the expected median OS is>12 months. However, PFS alone should not be the only endpoint and must be supported by additional endpoints including pre-defined patient reported outcomes (PROs), time to second subsequent therapy (TSST), or time until definitive deterioration of quality of life (TUDD). © The Author 2016.

Filiaciones:
Wilson M.K.:
 ANZGOG, Sydney, Australia

Pujade-Lauraine E.:
 GINECO, Paris, France

Aoki D.:
 JGOG, Tokyo, Japan

Mirza M.R.:
 NSGO, Copenhagen, Scandinavia, Denmark

Lorusso D.:
 MITO, Milano, Italy

Oza A.M.:
 PMHC, Toronto, Canada

du Bois A.:
 AGO, Essen, Germany

Vergote I.:
 BGOG, Leuven, Belgium

Reuss A.:
 AGO, Essen, Germany

Bacon M.:
 GCIG, Kingston, Canada

Friedlander M.:
 ANZGOG, Sydney, Australia

Gallardo-Rincon D.:
 GICOM, Mexico

Joly F.:
 GINECO, Paris, France

Chang S.-J.:
 KGOG, Suwon, South Korea

Ferrero A.M.:
 ManGO, Turin, Italy

Edmondson R.J.:
 MRC/NCRI, Gateshead, United Kingdom

Wimberger P.:
 NOGGO, Dresden, Germany

Maenpaa J.:
 NSGO, Copenhagen, Scandinavia, Denmark

Gaffney D.:
 RTOG, Salt Lake City, United States

Zang R.:
 SGOG, Shanghai, China

Okamoto A.:
 JGOG, Tokyo, Japan

Stuart:
 CCTG, Vancouver, Canada

Ochiai K.:
 JGOG, Tokyo, Japan
ISSN: 09237534
Editorial
OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Review
Volumen: 28 Número: 4
Páginas: 727-732
WOS Id: 000397622100012
ID de PubMed: 27993805